Comments on: Howto: Determine the version of SLES Linux http://thebackroomtech.com/2008/09/03/howto-determine-the-version-of-sles-linux/ serving up the info back room techs everywhere find interesting Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:28:25 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: David http://thebackroomtech.com/2008/09/03/howto-determine-the-version-of-sles-linux/#comment-1786 David Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:16:54 +0000 http://thebackroomtech.wordpress.com/?p=781#comment-1786 I recently found, that unlike SLES 9, SLES 10 don´t save last used kernel, when updating to new version. It´s very dangerous, when new kernel isn´t working. Maybe it´s not default behavior, I don´t tried dig in to this deeply now. I recently found, that unlike SLES 9, SLES 10 don´t save last used kernel, when updating to new version. It´s very dangerous, when new kernel isn´t working. Maybe it´s not default behavior, I don´t tried dig in to this deeply now.

]]> By: Mike http://thebackroomtech.com/2008/09/03/howto-determine-the-version-of-sles-linux/#comment-1781 Mike Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:43:08 +0000 http://thebackroomtech.wordpress.com/?p=781#comment-1781 SPident -vv for even more frightening detail about which packages meet which service pack level. Try SPident -vvv for an even deeper level of detail. SPident -vv for even more frightening detail about which packages meet which service pack level.

Try SPident -vvv for an even deeper level of detail.

]]> By: furicle http://thebackroomtech.com/2008/09/03/howto-determine-the-version-of-sles-linux/#comment-1780 furicle Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:05:30 +0000 http://thebackroomtech.wordpress.com/?p=781#comment-1780 Wouldn't `uname -a` be more reliable and accurate? Wouldn’t `uname -a` be more reliable and accurate?

]]>